There are sizable rocks, deep ruts and flooding. One fights for tracking in slippery red clay with the cattle, goats, sheep and occasional zebra. There are very few vehicles and no gas stations, police stations, restaurants, fire stations, farm equipment, recreation areas, hospitals, electric poles. Occasionally we would see a herd of cattle or goats being tended by either women or children.
When we passed folks walking along the side of the road, most often, they waved. We brought with us a guest, Karen, from the Maryknoll group of former sisters known as the “Full Circle.” She is in Nairobi for three months volunteering at the sisters’ section house and was very interested in the IDPs. Karen has a Ph.D. in social work and I thought her expertise would enhance the purpose of our visit. Karen also participated in preparing this blog post.
| Karen from Maryknoll talking with Assistant Chief Paul |
Since our visit two months ago, the juxtaposition of abject poverty and the majestic beauty of the Rift Valley where the camp is situated, is ever greater. It is planting season in this beautiful place and as far as you can see are plots of various shades of green, the new plants at various stages of growth, contrasted with the red clay earth.
The “balloting” for 2.5 acres of plots has taken place and each family has been assigned their new land. Consequently, the process of building/planning the new community was in the infancy stage as we met. What they had done was to put all the “paper plots” into a bag and everyone picked their plot out of it. Therefore, it was the luck of the draw as to who got what plot.
As we spoke it became clear of the 92 plots, 40 are prime land, arable; 30 lots are not as prime, partly rocky, but usable; and 20 or more were deemed not arable. It was already known that families assigned to these plots would not be able to grow anything. Some of the twenty families with the prime plots had already moved their tents to their assigned area, had begun erecting houses and had planted coffee – this in a few weeks or so.
It was as Lucas, the chairman, a tall handsome man, and the Planning Committee who explained what had been done since our last visit. An assistant chief from the area, Paul, also joined us as did Francis, a member of another community who had been advising these IDPs since their arrival. Another group of 20 men were sitting on the ground in front of us and a group of 15 women, which later swelled to about 50 were sitting back about 300 feet. As the meeting progressed, they kept moving forward until by the end of the meeting, they were in alignment with the men’s group.
I asked where the young people were. Two were there as part of the council but not sitting with us – rather they were hidden in the group of adults. I urged the youth to move forward and truly become part of this group.
We asked about the disparity between plot assignments. At first Lucas advised that it was simply “bad luck” on the part of those who got the marshy, rocky land. Change/decisions should be community based, not JPIC based. I pointed out that now was the time to address the disparity between the plot assignments. If they did not do it now, it would cause major dissension in the group.
As I said this, the women moved forward and began to speak in low, but angry tones. I asked what the women were saying. With that, it was as though the lid came off. Those with the poor plots were very frustrated, raising their voice ever louder, saying they could not build on their land, neither houses nor latrines, and could not plant crops. They wanted us to all go and see what they were talking about.
| Inspecting the rocky, marshy plots. The latrine pits could not be dug because of the conditions. |
Something had to be done, and done now before all the fertile plotters left the base community and went out on their own.
We discussed that neither the council nor Lucas, as its chair, had any legal responsibility to address the problem of the plot problem, but they had a moral one. They had come from different tribes who had been fighting and killing one another. They had all lost their homes, extended families, friends, communities and were thrust together in this tented village. Did they want to perpetuate this against their fellow community with whom they have lived and suffered for five years? Did they wish for dissension again, possibly violence with the stratification now of the haves and have-nots.
Lucas responded that the solution was not an easy one. We agreed, but stated that this was a cop-out for them. They had lived five years of a very not-easy-life. They could do this. We discussed several ways of handling the situation: the community could tax the produce of the better plots, that tax money could be borrowed with no interest by the owners of the marshy, rocky plot to buy coffee hulling machines, or to pay for training in a trade. Once they were up and running, they would pay back the monies and be taxed themselves. The money then could be the start of a co-op to help young folks get training, college, or farm equipment.
The group came up another solution, that of reassigning “common land” that was to be used communally. They might be able to switch this area and give it to those who got the poor plots. These problems had to be solved by the community if it is to survive as a “community”. It was an exhausting day capped off by a trek across the fields, at the instance of some of the women who got the poor plots, who wanted us to document the situation. Yes, I saw flooded, marshy earth, with channels dug for water overage. Yes, I saw half completed pit latrines full of water and rocks. Yes, I witnessed great frustration at the “have-nots” unable to start their new lives while witnessing the “haves” moving right along. But I saw a great deal more.
I no longer ask “Where is God?” in all of the despair of the marginalized poor. Over the past decade of work in Africa and Nicaragua, I have learned that God is present in the people in their hope and certitude that tomorrow will be a better day. They want to stay on their marshy plots and it is their belief that the community will work to solve the inequality brought about by the “balloting.”
For this IDP community, who has come so far, I also firmly believe they will succeed.
-Susan






